Managing Biological Risks in Biomedical laboratories of Public Hospitals in Athens, Greece, based on the Biosafety requirements

Authors

  • Dionysios Vourtsis Department of Biomedical Sciences, University of West Attica, Athens, Greece
  • Efstathia Papageorgiou Department of Biomedical Sciences, University of West Attica, Athens, Greece
  • Anastasios Kriebardis Department of Biomedical Sciences, University of West Attica, Athens, Greece
  • George Albert Karikas Department of Biomedical Sciences, University of West Attica, Athens, Greece
  • Gijsbert van Willigen Medical Center, Leiden University, Leiden, Holland
  • Kostas Kotrokois Department of Public Health Policies, University of West Attica, Athens, Greece
  • Georgios Dounias Department of Public Health Policies, University of West Attica, Athens, Greece
  • Petros Karkalousos Department of Biomedical Sciences, University of West Attica, Athens, Greece

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.19044/esj.2025.v21n37p122

Keywords:

Biosafety, Biorisk Management, Risk Assessment, Biosafety legislation, Biomedical laboratories

Abstract

Objectives: The aim of the present study was to review the laboratory workers’ perception on the biological risks in biomedical laboratories of public hospitals in Athens, Greece. It was also to evaluate how they are managing the biological materials and to propose mitigation measures according to the existing risks, based on the local legislation and the international Biosafety guidelines. Materials and Methods: The study was designed as a cross-sectional study with a detailed health and safety (H&S) questionnaire focused on biosafety and biorisk management. A total of 36 biosafety level-2 biomedical laboratories in 20 public hospitals were assessed for their biosafety containment specifics and compliance with biosafety practices. Laboratory staff (medical laboratory doctors, medical laboratory technologists, laboratory assistants, biologists and biochemists, n = 415) completed the questionnaire. Results and Discussion: The results showed, that a significant percentage of laboratories lacked proper management of the biological agents and biological materials in general, as could be seen in the following reduced percentage data: restricted access (48.9%), controlled and independent ventilation (36.6%), use of BSCs (31.8%), biorisk management system in place (31.6%), risk assessments (28.4%), biosafety manuals (21.4%), SOPs (35.9%), assigned biosafety officers (10.8%), occupational medical doctor (34.9%), emergencies plan (34.2%), accidents reporting (25.5%), and biosafety training programs (28.2%). Conclusion: There are marked deficiencies in containment and administrative controls, as well as in the implementation of the Greek and EU biosafety legislation. This emphasize the urgency of addressing critical gaps in biosafety and in emergency preparedness in Greek biomedical laboratories. Therefore, a Biorisk Management System, risk assessments, SOPs, assignment of Biosafety Officers, staff trainings and emergency response plans should be developed, applied and enforced, in compliance with the local and European legislation and guidelines.

Downloads

Published

2025-01-15

How to Cite

Vourtsis, D., Papageorgiou, E., Kriebardis, A., Karikas, G. A., van Willigen, G., Kotrokois, K., … Karkalousos, P. (2025). Managing Biological Risks in Biomedical laboratories of Public Hospitals in Athens, Greece, based on the Biosafety requirements. ESI Preprints (European Scientific Journal, ESJ), 21(37), 122. https://doi.org/10.19044/esj.2025.v21n37p122

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 3 > >>